The shape of water screenplay pdf download

Most people relate to the search for a soul mate, and when the protagonist is a slightly strange and mute social misfit, her character growth journey to finding a soul mate is all the more unlikely, and therefore rewarding for the audience. Her aim to save the fish-man is surpassed by the even finer values involved in finding love and partnership. So why did it win Best Film and not Best Screenplay? However, the cause of this problem lies in the moral argument. As a writer, it is worth noting that not only do the finest stories generally have a clear moral argument, but that morality basically informs everything; from the character definitions through every action they take to the life lessons that the audience takes away with them into their own lives.

It is the morality under discussion threaded into every character, every dilemma, every event and the whole story itself I will write a separate blog post to explain this in more depth. In The Shape of Water the moral argument is concerned with whether governments should be killing new species in the name of research. He has cancer. So he starts using his chemistry expertise to make drugs in order to leave money to his family before he goes. That is terrific story, because we are with him at least for a while… as he makes what could be considered logical, caring decisions.

The characters take a stance in the moral argument and we in the audience have our own choices to make in how we evaluate those stances and who we are hoping wins out.

Are we really cheering the bad guy on to his next murder?! Are we really rooting against the police?! THAT is how to make dimensionally wonderful bad guys, and powerfully compelling antagonism.

In Mary Poppins , the antagonism comes from the father — Mr Banks. He is misguided; committing his life to the bank instead of to his children. In Juno , there is no bad guy. There is a pregnant teenager. How should society treat a pregnant teenager? Every character has a different moral stance in the argument over how society should deal with a teenage mother and her baby.

The antagonism comes from the conflicts between these moral stances, each represented by a different character. As a character, Elisa has no dilemma. Because they are not difficult decisions, they are simple, obvious decisions anyone would take, and that undermines the story and renders her character simplistic too. They do not even have some warped justification they tell themselves. They are just out there, twirling their moustaches and doing evil things.

So we take sides and there is no problem for us in hating them. To fix this, the writers needed to introduce some level of empathy with the bad side in order to make things difficult for Elisa and make us squirm a little, like we do as we grapple with the morality surrounding Walter White or Juno. Killing one fish-man could save all these people. She must choose to save the fish-man and future soul-mate OR save the life of her best friend.

We tweaked the morality a little, so the story is now properly centred around the rights and wrongs of animal research. A terrific, divisive and morally provocative subject, with cultural resonance and reasonable, understandable arguments on many sides. Can I suggest the books by R. Lee Smith for you to try? I consider "Land of the beautiful dead", "Heat" and "Cottonwood" masterpieces in the erotic horror category.

And of course there is also Clive Barker the author of "Cabal", "Abarat", "Sacrament" and so many other books who taught me firstly and before it becomes fashion trend exactly what erotic horror and erotic fantasy mean.

Not that before the 90s there were no books about monsters. But you mainly felt sorry for them, not lust for them. I could definitely place this book in the above mentioned categories, however on the lighter side of monster romance fiction. There is no gore, not much rejection by the plain and common humans because there is no interaction with them and the love story and sex are more implied and less described.

The book is lyrical and emotional. It is a manifesto against the hate and fear for anything different. A beautiful love story. It has a happy ending because it needs to have a happy ending. She reaches out to him. To herself. There is no difference. She understands now. She holds him, he holds her, they hold each other, and all is dark, all is light, all is ungliness, all is beauty, all is pain, all is grief, all is never, all is forever.

It can be read easily. The chapters are short and the situations locations, feelings, dialogues are so well and detailed described that they reminded me movie scenes. Each chapter corresponds to a scene and it mainly has one main character or two main characters on the spotlight. I highly recommend it, even if you have not watched the Oscar-winning movie.

Which obviously is a masterpiece! What a great way to end the year! From Stephen King's social media pages I decided to read the book, before I watched the movie and I do not regret it!

View all 34 comments. Feb 23, Charlotte May rated it it was ok Shelves: supernatural-paranormal , magical-realism , contemporary-recent , sci-fi. We dragged it up here. We tortured it.

What's next? What species do we wipe out next? Is it us? I hope it is. We deserve it. I went into this knowing that it would be pretty odd. Definitely up there on the strange scale. The first pages or so were pretty slow, I wasn't invested, and almost gave up. We have 2 main POVs, that of Elisa - a mute janitor working in a science facility.

She has worked there for 14 years alongside her friend Zelda, both of them being treated like shit by everyone else who works there. I think we are supposed to dislike him, but maybe not quite to the level I did. He made my blood boil, and I sat reading with this deep seated hatred burning inside me. He works in the science facility, though we aren't entirely sure what his role is.

Now, the whole story relies on a slight suspension of disbelief. Elisa discovered what is hidden in one of the labs aka the asset and soon is spending lots of her time there. Of course, soon she catches feels and everything escalates from there. She is determined to help him escape. The main issue I had, is that we are supposed to accept the creature as more of a man than an animal. So it is less like bestiality and more just a different form of love. The problem I had with this was view spoiler [ when she helps him escape and takes him back to her apartment, he actually EATS one of her neighbours cats.

A couple of chapters were from Strickland's wife's POV which I found interesting because yaas girl you deserve better. But there were also ones fron the POV of the creature which again - were just plain weird.

Overall, very very bizarre. Not even sure if I will check out the film or not View all 31 comments. Mar 24, Jilly rated it really liked it Shelves: sci-fi. The book is awesome, as long as you remind yourself to stay in the moment. The fantasy. The UNreality. Because, if not, you will be thinking weird shit, like me. See, I'm a weird shit thinker. I'll let you know where my twisted mind went in just a second. First, about the book. It has multiple POV's and is about an amphibious man-like creature that the army found in the Amazon and immediately captured to study it in the lab.

It sounds about right. As we learned in E. Luckily, the female mute janitor that cleans the den of horrors lab where he's kept is crazy and desperate pure-hearted enough to think she and the Swamp Thing are in love, so she decides to try and save it. And, have sex with it. Because, you know. That only makes sense. This is where the weird shit thinking comes in.

I can't help but thinking that this creature may not exactly be the best choice for a sex partner. Well, aside from the obvious.. Because it reminded me of that gorilla that learned sign language. You remember the story? That gorilla could communicate with the humans. And, the humans naturally loved Coco, and Coco loved the humans.

Does this mean that Coco and the humans should have gotten down with hot monkey sex? Because that is gross, and weird, and wrong, and about a thousand ways to Sunday creepy. Yet, the extent of the communication between Swamp Thing and our heroine is actually less than Coco's communication and understanding with her human caretakers. Sure, his thoughts were sweet, pure, and simple. But, they were NOT sexy. And, not that particularly intelligent.

Yes, it is sentient, but not even close to being like us. To me, this made the idea of Swampy Sexy Times very icky. My name's not even Doreen. Swamp Thing is a moron. But, if you could erase all of the mental images I just put into your head, you will love this book. Because it is intriguing and has a fun throw-back to the 's feel to it. It's totally worth reading. View all 49 comments. For a variety of reasons. And before TSoW, I considered a ten page chapter to be short.

Getting through five chapters went a lot quicker than it usually does. The short, powerful chapters had an effect usually reserved for significantly longer books—I felt like I knew the characters, and knew them well, almost immediately. The story itself. It had ups and downs. Pretty simple, right? Government bad, underdog good. Love conquers all. Yes and no. Elisa is an orphan with mysterious scars on her throat, the byproduct of a surgery she has no memory of or explanation for that left her unable to speak.

Her loneliness is palpable. His training only serves to give him the experience and authority to break more shit than a civilian could. And the list goes on. All of this is made more intense by the s setting. The evil man has more power. The orphan, the gay man, the black woman, and the white housewife have fewer options, are thoughtlessly victimized in ways that fifty years later seem incomprehensible.

In the words of book bff: those fingers will haunt me forever. You: What fingers? You: Eww. Me: You have no idea. A couple of lost digits, etc. View all 16 comments. Jun 27, Tina Haigler rated it really liked it. This book was beautiful. I can't think of any other way to describe it. The story, the characters, the words themselves. It was all beautiful. The best way I can think of to describe the way this book made me feel is I'm a shoreline and the words in this book are the waves in the ocean, coming and going, each time leaving something, but also taking something with them when they leave.

The book is split into four parts. Parts one and two are mostly storytelling, atmosphere building, and character development. Parts three and four are where most of the action is. Getting through the first two parts is worth it, once the story picks up pace and the excitement starts.

To be honest, the first half of the book is very interesting but it's not very exciting. You can tell from the length of the chapters if it is going to be storytelling or action. Anything over two pages is storytelling.

I really enjoyed the pace of the action chapters and how quickly it switches points of view. It gave a sense of urgency to the story. The characters were amazing as well. Even the characters I didn't like were fascinating. There's the main protagonist, Elisa, an orphan who is mute, works as a janitor, and has a serious shoe fetish. Also her next door neighbor Giles, an elderly, homosexual artist, her best friend Zelda, a fellow janitor, Hoffstetler, a Russian scientist assigned to the creature, and the creature, of course, who was never given a name, was sometimes referred to as the asset.

The main antagonist is Strickland, a military man, in charge of the creature. We also have POV chapters of his wife, Mrs. Strickland, but she is more of a connecting character, interacting with characters of the main story but never interacting with the main story itself. I didn't love Elisa but I didn't hate her. She kind of wallowed in her own pity and I'm never fond of that. She had a terrible upbringing though so I tried to be sympathetic. I did love Giles, Zelda, and the creature though.

Zelda has that spunk that I love to see in characters and Giles was just a sweet old man. The creature was magnificent and I would've loved to learn more about him. Hoffstetler was more of a gray character. You never really knew if he would do the right thing or not. Strickland was one of my favorites to read. I have always been obsessed with psychology and how different minds work, so reading his POV was frightening and at the same time fascinating.

As far as the wife, I was pretty neutral towards her but liked her more toward the end. We hope that the movie will keep doing better in the coming days, helping the producers Guillermo del Toro, J. The film was released on 01 December and has been doing good business at the box office. But, it still continues to leak new films online. The website keeps changing its domain extension and can also be accessed through proxy servers.

November 17, Your weekend reading stack just got a little taller. Three Billboards Outside Battle of the Sexes. Beauty and the Beast.

You Might Also Like. Leave this field blank.